Width-adjustable cutting instrument for transapical aortic valve resectioning

ABSTRACT

A surgical cutting instrument for transapical aortic valve resection includes a cutting unit arranged on the distal end of a tool shaft and at least one mechanical cutting element for making a circular incision. The at least one cutting element can be adapted, in particular continuously adapted to different aortic diameters by means of a radially movable actuating mechanism.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the U.S. National Phase of International ApplicationNo. PCT/EP2013/070363, filed Sep. 30, 2013, which claims the benefit ofpriority of German Application No. DE 10 2012 109 459.4, filed Oct. 4,2012, the contents of both applications being incorporated by referenceherein in their entireties.

FIELD

The present invention relates to a surgical, in particular endoscopiccutting instrument for transapical aortic valve resection.

BACKGROUND

In the event of an aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency, a surgicalprocedure is indicated in many cases, in which the body's own aorticvalve is replaced by an artificial aortic valve. Apart from the opensurgical operation which is carried out under general anesthetic and byuse of a heart-lung apparatus and in which the sternum is opened upusing a saw, the heart is exposed and has to be stopped, the aorticvalve can also be replaced in a minimally invasive procedure on thebeating heart. In doing so, an access route via the femoral artery(transfemoral) or via the cardiac apex (transapical) is selected.

One possible way is the introduction of an aortic valve prosthesis whichexpands by itself or is expanded by means of a balloon and displaces thebody's own aortic valve. However, the bloodstream may be impaired byundefined lateral openings which are generated between the artificialaortic valve and the aortic wall if the natural aortic valve is notremoved but crushed against the aortic wall by the artificial aorticvalve.

In this regard, it is recommended to first remove the body's own aorticvalve prior to inserting the artificial aortic valve.

Regarding the aortic valve resection, many solutions are known in whichthe calcified aortic valve is cut out with a laser. There are alsopublications, however, according to which the calcified aortic valve (inthe laboratory and on a pig) has been removed by an “aorta punchingdevice”.

The process of separating the calcified aortic valve with lasertechnology is very time-consuming and not very precise, too. The removalof a valve with an “aorta punching device” is not feasible at present,as the rigid punching head already matched with the inner diameter ofthe aorta has to be passed through the constricted aortic valve andchalky particles deposited on the aortic valve may come loose and findtheir way into the blood circulation, which might result in athrombosis. Here, a further problem is the fact that the aorticdiameters vary in the range between approximately 15 mm and 35 mm, sothat a rigid punch head does not have the optimum diameter in themajority of cases, which in turn has the consequence that the providedaortic valve inserted therein does not have the optimum fit.

SUMMARY

Thus, it is the object of the present invention to provide a surgicalcutting tool for an aortic valve resection, which allows the bestpossible fit of the new artificial aortic valve, without the phenomenonof chalky plaque coming loose from the valve and finding their way intothe bloodstream.

A surgical, in particular endoscopic, cutting instrument according tothe invention is suitable in particular for a transapical aortic valveresection. It comprises a cutting unit arranged on the distal end of atool shaft and comprising at least one mechanical cutting element formaking a circular incision. Said cutting element may comprise, forexample, an annular blade or may be implemented as a blade which isrotatable around the longitudinal axis of the shaft. According to theinvention, the at least one cutting element can be adjusted in its widthvia an actuating or spreading mechanism, in particular in continuouslyvariable fashion. Specifically, the radial distance between the at leastone cutting element and the longitudinal axis of the shaft (i.e. thecutting diameter) can be adapted to different aortic diameters.

The present invention provides a surgical cutting instrument whosediameter can be precisely adapted to the anatomic circumstances of theaorta, in particular to the aortic diameter, so that one and the sameinstrument can be used for the resection of aortic valves in differentsizes and diameters and precisely adapted in each case, instead of beingforced to produce and use different instruments for different aorticdiameters.

The precise adaptation to the respective circumstances further allowsthe achievement of an optimum fit of the new artificial aortic valve andensures, among other things, that the aortic valve reliably claws intothe aorta and hence cannot migrate any more. The actual function of thevalve (flow control) is also enhanced, because it is able to deployon-site preferably to the full extent and in circular shape. Thisoptimizes the blood flow, because it is not impaired any longer byundefined lateral openings—as explained at the outset—if the naturalaortic valve is removed.

According to one aspect of the invention, not only the at least onecutting element, but the cutting unit as a whole can be adjusted in itswidth, in particular in continuous fashion. If the cutting unit iscomposed of an actuating mechanism and cutting elements arranged thereonand the outer dimensions of the cutting unit are defined merely by theradially movable actuating mechanism, a radial movement of the actuatingmechanism does not only allow for the alteration of the cuttingdiameter, but also for the folding or expanding of the cutting unit as awhole. This width adjustment of the entire cutting unit allows to reducethe outer dimensions of the cutting unit on the whole to such an extentthat it is also capable of diving through a very narrow aortic valveaffected by a stenosis, without chalky particles coming loose in thisprocess, before the cutting unit or a part of the cutting unit is againexpanded to the aortic diameter behind the aortic valve.

Further, the proximal tool shaft is provided with a tool handle forholding and maneuvering the tool shaft, and with a handle piece (rotaryknob) for a manual width adjustment of the cutting element. In this way,the cutting element can be manually adjusted in its active (effective)cutting diameter even if it is already in the functional cuttingposition.

According to one aspect of the invention, the cutting unit is formed bya cutting tool which is rotatably supported around the tool shaft andcomprises at least one cutting blade whose radial distance to therotational axis or tool shaft axis can be (in particular continuously)adjusted and in this way can be matched with different aortic diameters.

The radial distance of the cutting blade can be altered in a simplemanner if the cutting blade is arranged on a supporting arm in fixed ordetachable fashion, said supporting arm being radially movable via theactuating mechanism, for instance in outward direction. Thus, thecutting unit can be inserted into the heart and through the naturalaortic valve in the folded or compacted state and then can be expandedor spread to the respective aortic diameter. If need be, the cuttingunit can be made smaller or folded again after the cutting process.

According to an aspect of the invention, the cutting blade may bearranged such that it extends in the axial direction or in a directionparallel to the tool shaft axis and performs the cut in the rotationalor circumferential direction.

In order to prevent the blade(s) from injuring any tissue during theinsertion of the instrument, the blade(s) may be arranged contrary tothe insertion direction or may point toward the proximal side of thetool shaft.

The actuating mechanism may be designed such that one or more supportingarms distributed in the circumferential direction and supporting cuttingblades can be expanded and retracted parallel to the tool shaft axis, sothat the cutting blade(s) always remain(s) axially parallel or inparallel alignment relative to the tool shaft axis throughout the entireadjustment range. A so-called parallelogram-type mechanic system may beused for the parallel translation of the supporting arm.

The higher the number of cutting blades distributed on the cutting tool,the smaller is the rotary motion of the cutting tools which is requiredfor the cutting process in order to carry out a cut by 360°.

The supporting arms allow for the centering of the cutting tool withinthe aortic inner wall. This is why the cutting tool preferably comprisesat least 3 supporting arms.

The use of three cutting blades which are arranged on three supportingarms distributed with a distance of respectively 120°, constitutes agood compromise between a space-saving stowage of the supporting armsand the associated actuating mechanism, on the one hand, and thesmallest possible rotary motion on the other hand.

According to one aspect of the invention, the entire distal portion ofthe tool shaft or at least the cutting tool together with the cuttingblades can be detached from the tool shaft. This allows for thedetachment of the cutting tool from the instrument after the cuttingprocess and for its recovery in some other way. This modularconstruction further allows a simple replacement of the cutting toolwithout the need to replace the entire instrument as a whole.

According to another aspect of the invention, the cutting unit is notformed by a cutting tool comprising a rotatable cutting blade, but by apunch-die assembly movable relative to each other at least in the axialdirection. Here, the punch unit and/or the die unit comprises a thin,elastically bendable foil which is bent into a ring and overlaps in thecircumferential direction and whose edge forms an essentially annularblade. The diameter of said annular blade can thus be continuouslyadapted to different aortic diameters by rolling up or unwinding thefoil or by a relative displacement of the foil ends in thecircumferential direction.

The basic principle of said cutting unit acting as a punch is based onthe use of a thin and elastic foil which indeed is very flexible in thelongitudinal direction and can be bent or rolled up into an arc, a ringor even to a further extent, but which has a relative sharp and stiffedge in the transverse direction. The process of annularly bending thefoil, the foil band or strip and by a corresponding arrangement of thefoil around the longitudinal axis of the shaft, said foil produces inthe axial direction, i.e. in the punching or cutting direction, arelative stiff punching or cutting unit and achieves a sort of “Coke caneffect”.

In this arrangement, the foil is arranged on the side facing the dieunit or punch unit. By a corresponding actuation of the punch-dieassembly, the aortic valve or any other tissue to be severed can beclamped and stamped out or cut between the punch and the die; here, atleast one of these two elements comprises the annular blade or foil.

A further advantage of such a foil blade which can be adjusted in widthis—in addition to the cost-effective production—the easy fixing abilityof the foil in the cutting unit as well as the automatic widthadjustment of the foil. Due to the elasticity of the foil, the latterstrives to return to its initial state again after an elastic bendingdeformation. In other words, the foil tends to automatically unrollafter having been rolled up. This radial pretensioning force can beutilized, on the one hand, for a fixation in a corresponding mount inthe cutting unit (force-fit) and, on the other hand, a suitable radialfoil guide allows to control this roll-up process such that the foil orthe punching unit can be enlarged in its diameter relatively preciselyand in circular fashion, without the need of actively enlarging thediameter of the foil bent into the ring. The foil automatically followsa width adjustment of the foil guide or foil mount toward a largerdiameter.

According to one aspect of the invention, the length of the foil can beselected such that it is longer than the circumference of the largestadjustable cutting diameter. This ensures that the foil ends of the foilalways overlap, allowing not only to achieve a closed annular blade, butalso providing the possibility that the exterior foil end radiallysupports and guides the interior foil end, for instance in a subsequentdecrease of the diameter and during coiling up the foil. In this way, itis ensured throughout the entire adjustment range that the foil endsguide themselves.

According to one aspect of the invention, the punch unit and/or the dieunit may comprise an annular assembly of several bent, thin andelastically bendable foils which overlap in the circumferentialdirection and whose edges form an essentially annular blade whosediameter can be continuously adapted to different aortic diameters by arelative movement of the foils in the circumferential direction. In thiscase, not a single foil bent into a ring is used, but several foilsarranged one behind the other and bent into a ring are used, withneighboring foils overlapping each other. It may be provided inparticular that there is a multitude of identical foils or foil segmentswhich are uniformly distributed in the circumferential direction.

The use of a multitude of foils strung together and partiallyoverlapping in the circumferential direction instead of a single foilwhich is bent into a circle and overlaps in the circumferentialdirection increases the width adjustment range. Actually, it has turnedout that—with a single foil and a large adjustment range of the bladediameter—the foil has to be coiled several times for reaching the smallblade diameters. Due to coiling up the foil several times, not only thefrictional force of the foils among each other increases with eachwinding (cf. belt friction), but it may also happen that the foils gapeopen at some places, which is detrimental to the cutting effect.However, a number of shorter foil segments does not show this phenomenonand exhibits a lower frictional or clamping force during reducing thecutting diameter and rolling up the foil segments than a single foilwhich is coiled several times.

In similar fashion as described above, the overall length of all foilsshould be longer than the circumference of the largest adjustablecutting diameter. In order to improve the mutual radial guidance of thefoils or to facilitate it at all, the foils overlap in thecircumferential direction one by one alternating on the outside andinside. This is why the foils slide on each other so as to get coiled orunrolled.

Preferably, the employed foil is a thin, flexible metal foil. Forincreasing elasticity, the metal foil may also consist of a superelasticmaterial such as Nitinol, for example.

In order to further increase the cutting or punching performance of thefoil, the foil or its side edge(s) may be provided with a bevel.

In addition or as an alternative, the foil may have a cutting geometrywith which the entire blade does not come into contact at one go withthe tissue to be severed, reducing the punching and cutting forces. Thismay be achieved in particular by a serrated, wavy or slanted cuttingedge.

For adjusting the width of the foil blade, the punch unit and/or the dieunit comprises foil guides which can be adjusted in width via theactuating mechanism. The foil(s) is/are axially and radially fixed inthe foil guides in such a manner that they can move in thecircumferential direction during the width adjustment of the actuatingmechanism or upon a radial movement of the foil guides.

For coiling and unrolling the foil or the foil segments, they must havethe opportunity to get coiled in the circumferential direction and to bebent inwards to an even larger extent or to get unrolled and furtherunbent. The axial supporting absorbs the punching and cutting forces.The radial guide controls the diameter adjustment of the foil blade. Inthe course of a controlled adjustment of the foil guide assembly of theinstrument (radial movement), the foil or the foil segments slide(s) oneach other due to its/their pretension (inherent elasticity), so thatthe diameter of the foil assembly can be increased or decreased as awhole.

According to one aspect of the invention, the punch along with itscircular or essentially annular blade advances toward the die or ananvil, as with bone punch.

As an alternative to this, both the punch unit and the die unit maycomprise a foil blade according to the invention. In this case, theirfoil guides or guiding assemblies may be designed such that the bladesof the punch unit and the die unit each have different cutting diameterssuch that the two blades move past each other or perform a shearingmotion or overlap in the axial direction. This improves the cuttingperformance. It is also conceivable that the two blades directly hiteach other.

In order to facilitate the manipulation of the cutting instrumentaccording to the invention for the surgeon and to ensure that the punchand the die as well as the cooperating blades always exhibit the correctwidth or correct difference in diameter, the width-adjustable guidingassembly of the punch unit and the width-adjustable guiding assembly ofthe die unit may be coupled to each other. The synchronous and analogwidth adjustment of said two units may be carried out in particular viaa corresponding mechanical adjustment system and via a handpiece or amotor-powered device on the proximal end of the tool shaft.

According to one aspect of the invention, the supporting arms arespring-biased in the radial outward direction via one or severalsprings. These springs serve as an energy storage means for thespreading mechanism of the cutting tool. If the supporting arms arereleased, they will spread out by themselves due to the spring-inducedpretension until they come into contact with the aortic inner wall whichforms a kind of stop for the automatic spreading mechanism. The radialforce of the supporting arms can also be adjusted via the spring-inducedpretensioning. The supporting arms can be retracted again via aretraction mechanism.

In order to avoid a migration of the artificial heart valve in the bestpossible way, it is advantageous if the natural valve is not severedexactly at the aortic inner wall, but if there remains a constantattachment fixing the artificial valve in the axial direction. This iswhy the foil guide can be provided with a spacer or the foil in theguiding assembly can be guided at a certain distance radially within theouter dimension of the guiding assembly, so that it is ensured that theaortic wall is not impaired during punching. According to one aspect ofthe invention, it is possible that only the outer diameter of theguiding assembly is larger than the diameter of the annular blade by adefined predetermined distance. The radially raised or spread foilguides allow for the stretching of the aortic inner wall, whereas theblades provided so as to be further radially inside sever the aorticvalve.

As the outer dimensions of the cutting unit are essentially determinedby the guiding assembly, it is of advantage if the guiding assembly canbe made flush with the tool shaft and the annular blade formed by the atleast one foil can be reduced essentially to the diameter of the toolshaft. This allows the cutting unit to pass through the aortic valve,without scratching off or loosening any chalky plaque.

According to one aspect of the invention, the guiding assembly may beformed by several radially adjustable supporting arms distributed in thecircumferential direction and coupled to each other, which can beparallel to the tool shaft axis via a parallelogram-type mechanicsystem, so that the foils are always aligned and guided so as to beaxially parallel or parallel to the punching axis.

By means of two joint rods, the guiding arms are each articulated on twotool shaft components which can be moved axially relative to each other.Due to the axial displacement of the two tool shaft components, theguiding arms are raised radially outwards or pulled radially inwards viathe joint rods. This conversion of an axial movement of a tool shaftdrive into a radial movement of the guiding arms cannot only be handledand adjusted in a simple manner, but is also very space-saving.

According to one aspect of the invention, the number of the foils isequal to the number of the guiding arms. Here, the foil lengths arelarger than the circular arc portion between two guiding arms with thelargest adjustable cutting diameter.

According to one aspect, the guiding assembly comprises at least fourradially adjustable guiding arms uniformly distributed in thecircumferential direction. This is why the foils having the tendency tomove radially outward are radially supported at least at four points.

Further, each foil may be firmly connected to a foil end on acorresponding guiding arm, preferably in a substance-to-substance bond.This ensures that the foil maintains its circumferential position or itsrelative position with respect to neighboring foils. On the other hand,it is ensured that the foil is fastened to the tool and cannot fall outof the guide, but without impeding the bending of the foil and thesliding of the foils during coiling and unrolling.

In order to reduce the sliding resistance between the foils or theiroverlapping sections for facilitating the process of coiling andunrolling the foils, anti-friction platelets or an anti-friction layermay be interposed between the foils. As an alternative or in addition,the corresponding foil surfaces sliding on each other (or at leastportions of these) can be provided with an anti-friction coating.

According to one aspect of the invention, the foils in thewidth-adjustable foil guide may be supported in the radial directiononly from outside. That is to say, the bent foils due to their inherentelasticity automatically follow a width adjustment of the guiding armsin the radially outward direction. This is advantageous in particular ifthe instrument is to be adjusted during the surgical procedure only inone direction, i.e. if the cutting unit is only to be enlarged from acompacted initial position to the diameter matching with the aorticdiameter. In this case, the initially rolled-up foil follows theexpansion of the foil guide without any further ado.

Alternatively, the foils may be received in axial grooves or slitsprovided on end faces of the guiding arms such that they protrude fromthese in the axial direction at least by the cutting depth which is tobe expected. In these axial grooves, said foils are axially supported onthe bottom of the groove and have their radially inner and outer sidessupported by groove flanks. Said grooves are provided with such adimension in the radial direction so that they are able to receiveseveral foil layers in the compacted initial position. In the stretchedstate, there will be a larger radial clearance of the foils within thegrooves. This gap, however, is basically not that important as the foilspush outward by themselves and compensate for the gap.

However, in order to positively ensure that the foils do not tilt and donot swerve in the radial direction in the presence of an axial load, agap compensation means may be provided which adapts or minimizes thedistance between the foil layers and the groove walls depending on thedecoiling state or the width adjustment. The gap compensation means mayalso be implemented in the form of a clamping or tensioning meansbracing or clamping the foil in the axial grooves in the radialdirection prior to the cutting process.

According to an aspect of the invention, the gap compensation means orthe clamping or tensioning means may be a resilient element arranged inthe axial groove and pressing the foil or its foil layers against one ofthe groove's inner walls, preferably against the radially outer innerwall of the groove. The pressing force of the resilient element may bedimensioned such that it permits, on the one hand, the sliding of thefoil layers for coiling and decoiling the foils in the circumferentialdirection, but on the other hand prevents a radial spreading or tiltingof the foils within the groove.

Instead of a resilient element within the groove, the clamping ortensioning means may be designed such that at least one of the groovewalls can be repositioned in the radial direction and is capable ofcompensating for the gap generated during uncoiling the foils. In apreferred embodiment, the radially inner groove wall is repositionedradially outward. During the coiling process, it gives way in acorresponding manner towards the inside. The repositioning of the groovewall may also be realized by a spring element.

The clamping or tensioning means may also be implemented by a brake shoesystem which releases the foils for width adjustment and can beactivated immediately before the cutting process, e.g. by means of thehandpiece.

In order to ensure that the (metal) foils are always in a tight contact,so that the foil in the cutting unit and the foil in the die unit cantelescope during the punching or cutting process without touching theother foil, the resistive force can be reduced by a corresponding shapeof the foil ends. To this end, at least one foil end may be slanted orpointed or rounded.

In order to further enhance the cutting performance, the punch unitand/or the die unit may perform a screw-like movement or a predeterminedsuperimposed axial and rotational movement during the punching process.This may be achieved, for instance, by corresponding slotted guidesprovided in the tool shaft and forcing the punch unit and/or die unit toperform a rotary motion if they axially move toward each other in thecutting process.

According to an aspect of the invention, an elastic fine-mesh net may belaid over the foil guides or supporting arms, said net following theadjustment of the blade diameter and forming a closed space during thepunching process, in which the severed aortic valves can be collectedand safely recovered.

Depending on the case of application, it may be advantageous ornecessary if the distal part of the punch-die assembly or the portion ofthe tool shaft according to the invention located behind the aorticvalve is not pulled out along with the instrument after the aortic valveresection, but can be detached from the instrument and recovered in someother way. It is also possible to separately insert the two cuttingtools before the resection of the aorta and to connect them to eachother within the body in the so-called rendezvous procedure. This iswhy—according to one aspect of the invention—the punch unit and the dieunit may be detachably coupled to each other, so that the distal part ofthem can be coupled to or uncoupled from the tool shaft prior to orafter resection of the aortic valve.

According to one aspect of the invention, the instrument shaft can bedesigned to be flexible. In this case, the instrument shaft comprises acentral and axial through-hole for receiving a guide wire. The guidewire may have provided its distal end with an expandable positioningdevice such as a spreading mechanism, a balloon or the like, in order toposition and fix the guide wire in the vicinity of the aortic valve. Theflexible instrument shaft can then be guided to the aortic valve via theguide wire.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

The present invention is illustrated in more detail on the basis ofattached drawings in which:

FIG. 1 shows a cutting instrument of the invention according to a firstembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the instrument shaft comprising a foldedcutting unit (without foil blade) according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the instrument shaft comprising a spreadcutting unit (without foil blade) according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the instrument shaft comprising afolded cutting unit (without foil blade) according to the firstembodiment;

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the instrument shaft comprising aspread cutting unit (including foil blade) according to the firstembodiment;

FIG. 6 is an enlarged cross-sectional detail view of the foil guides ofthe cutting unit according to the first embodiment;

FIG. 7 is an enlarged cross-sectional detail view of the aorta after anaortic valve resection;

FIG. 8 shows an unwrapped foil blade in the initial state;

FIGS. 9A to 9D show various edge geometries of the foil blade;

FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a foil blade, formed by several foils,according to a second embodiment and having a medium cutting diameter;

FIG. 11 is a schematic view of a foil blade, formed by several foils,according to a second embodiment and having a maximum cutting diameter;

FIG. 12 is a schematic view of a foil blade, formed by several foils,according to a second embodiment and having a minimum cutting diameter;

FIG. 13 is a perspective partial view of a cutting instrument accordingto a third embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 14 is an enlarged view of the cutting unit of the cuttinginstrument according to the third embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows a cutting instrument 2 designed according to the inventionand having its distal end of a tool shaft 4 provided with a cutting unit6 which can be actuated via a handpiece 8 arranged on the proximal endof the tool shaft 4. The shaft 4 may be rigid or flexible; if necessary,it may be able to be manipulated via the handpiece 8. The cutting unit 6is essentially formed as a punch-die assembly and consists of twocutting tools 10 and 12 which are axially arranged on the tool shaft 4and can be moved toward each other or apart from each other via thehandpiece 8. To be more precise, the proximal cutting tool 10 in theillustrated example acts as a movable punch unit and the distal cuttingtool 12 acts as a static die unit. It goes without saying that—in analternative design—the distal cutting tool 12 is movable toward theproximal cutting tool 10 or both are movable relative to each other.

The cutting tools 10, 12 each comprise a blade 14 whose construction andway of functioning is described in more detail below.

The handpiece 8 comprises two ergonomically shaped, hinged handles 22and 24 which are biased into an initial position via a spring 26. In theinitial position, the cutting tools 10, 12 are spaced from each other.

The tool shaft 4 is of a multi-piece design and comprises a first shaftunit 28 which is connected on the one hand to the punch 10 and, on theother hand, is connected in articulated fashion to one of the handles22, 24, namely to the handle 22. The shaft unit 28 can be moved in axialdirection relative to a second shaft unit 30 which is connected on theone hand to the die 10 and, on the other hand, is connected inarticulated fashion to the other of the two handles 22, 24, i.e. handle24. The user of the instrument 2 may grip the handles 22 and 24 with hisfingers and ball of the hand and actuate them against the spring forceof the spring 26, so that the punch 10 is moved axially toward the die12 and punches or severs any tissue therebetween.

Both the cutting tool 10 acting as a punch and cutting tool 12 acting asa die can be adjusted in width via an actuating mechanism whoseconstruction and way of functioning is illustrated in detail below;here, FIG. 2 to FIG. 5 show in a simplified illustration only the toolshaft 4 without the handpiece 8.

The cutting unit 6 or the cutting tools 10 and 12 can be continuouslyadjusted between a packed or folded position in which the cutting tools10 and 12 have their minimum diameter (see FIG. 2 and FIG. 4), and aspread position in which the cutting tools 10 and 12 occupy theirmaximum diameter (see FIG. 3 and FIG. 5).

Each cutting tool 10 and 12 comprises several (in the present examplefour) guides or guiding arms 32 and 34 which are uniformly distributedin the circumferential direction and extend in the axial direction orparallel to the tool shaft 4. These guiding arms 32, 34 are each guidedvia several articulated arms 36 on the tool shaft 4 and can be adjustedvia said articulated arms 36 radially to the tool shaft 4, i.e. can bespread towards outside or collapsed inwards.

The first shaft unit 28 (see FIG. 5) of the first cutting tool 10consists of an exterior hollow shaft 38 and a second interior hollowshaft 40 which can be axially moved within the former. Among thearticulated arms 36 of the corresponding guiding arm 32, one articulatedarm 36 a is hinged to the exterior hollow shaft 38, whereas two otherarticulated arms 36 b, 36 c are hinged to the interior hollow shaft 40.The hinges via which the articulated arms 36 are connected to theguiding arms 32 and the exterior hollow shaft 38 or interior hollowshaft 40 define a parallelogram. Said parallelogram-type mechanic systemensures that the guiding arms 32 during width adjustment are always keptin parallel alignment with the tool shaft 4 if the two hollow shafts 38,40 are moved apart or into each other and, in so doing, push the guidingarms radially outward or pull them inward via the articulated arms 36hinged thereon (cf. FIG. 2 and FIG. 3). The three articulated arms 36 a,36 b, 36 c clearly define the position and the orientation of theguiding arms 32, so that the guiding arms 32 do not tilt relative to oneanother during a relative displacement of the shafts 38, 40.

The second shaft unit 30 of the second cutting tool 12 is constructed inthe same way as the first shaft unit 28 and likewise comprises two shaftpieces which can be axially moved relative to each other, i.e. anexterior hollow shaft 42 and a shaft 44 which is axially guided and canbe moved therein. It is to be noted that the second shaft unit 30 isreceived within the first shaft unit 28 and can be axially movedtherein. Also, the second shaft unit 30 comprises the parallelogram-typemechanic system which has been described in detail above and displaces(via the shaft pieces 42, 44 which can be shifted relative to eachother) the guiding arms 34 parallel to the shaft pieces 42, 44 and thetool shaft 4. Here, one articulated arm 36 d is connected to theexterior hollow shaft 42 and two articulated arms 36 e, 36 f areconnected to the interior shaft 44.

The distal end of the instrument shaft 4 is provided with a centralaxial hole 45 (see FIGS. 3 and 5) for a guide wire which extendsthroughout the entire instrument shaft 4. The cutting unit 6 can beguided to the aortic valve by means of a guide wire which has beenpositioned near the aortic valve and inserted in the instrument shaft.

In the present example, the width adjustment of the two cutting tools 10and 12 is mechanically coupled to each other, so that their diametersare enlarged or decreased collectively and in analog fashion.

The relative movement of the two shaft pieces 38, 40 associated to thefirst shaft unit 28 and of the two shaft pieces 42, 44 associated to thesecond shaft unit 30 is effected by a screw drive which is actuated viaa rotary knob 46 arranged on the proximal end of the tool shaft 4. Anyrotary movement which is input at this place is converted into atranslational relative displacement of the respective shaft pieces 38,40, 42, 44 with respect to one another. Said mechanic system requiredfor width adjustment is released if the handles 22, 24 are in theirinitial position, and are blocked if the handles 22, 24 are actuated forcutting purposes.

FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional view of the tool shaft 4 without thehandpiece 8. The rotary knob 46 is axially coupled to the exteriorhollow shaft 38 of the first shaft unit 28 and can be rotated relativeto it. The rotary knob 46 is also in threaded engagement with theinterior hollow shaft 40 of the first shaft unit 28, so that a rotarymotion of the rotary knob 46 results in an axial relative displacementof the two hollow shafts 38, 40, without turning these relative to eachother.

The rotary knob 46 is coupled in a torque-proof manner to a rotary piece50 via an eccentrically arranged axial pin 48, and said rotary piece isin turn axially coupled to a shaft end piece 52 and can be rotatedrelative to it. Said shaft end piece 52 is firmly connected to theinterior shaft 44 of the second shaft unit 30, whereas the rotary piece50 is in threaded engagement with the exterior hollow shaft 42 of thesecond shaft unit 30. Thus, any rotation of the rotary knob 46 does notonly result in a relative displacement of the shaft parts 38, 40 of thefirst shaft unit 28 and the concomitant width adjustment of the firstcutting tool 10, but—via the coupling to the rotary piece 50—also to arelative displacement of the shaft parts 42, 44 of the second shaft unit30 and a concomitant width adjustment of the second cutting tool 12. Itis due to said coupling that the shaft units 28, 30 and cutting tools10, 12 are adjusted in width in synchronous manner.

In the following, the construction and the width adjustment of theannular blade 14 will be explained.

The annular blade 14 is not formed by a static annular cutting element,but by a thin and narrow, flexible foil band 16 which may be made ofmetal or a metal alloy, in particular of Nitinol, or of any othersuitable elastically bendable material. The foil 16 or at least its edge18 should have such a small thickness that the edge 18 achieves acutting effect for human tissue in the presence of a certain pressureand optionally an additional rotary motion. For sharpening the edge 18,it may be additionally provided with a bevel.

Whereas the elongated foil band 16 is elastically bendable in thelongitudinal direction, it is comparably stiff in the transversedirection. If the foil 16 is bent to a ring such that the foil endsoverlap and—as illustrated in FIG. 5—is inserted in corresponding seats54 and 56 of the two cutting tools 10, 12, the rigidity of the foil 16will be increased to such an extent that it can be used as a blade. Dueto its elastically bendable pretension, the overlapping sections 20 ofthe foil 16 tightly rest against each other, so that the edges 18 of thefoil 16 form an essentially closed and ring-shaped annular blade 14.

The seat 54 and 56 are located on opposing axial ends of the guidingarms 32 and 34. The width of the foils 16 is sized such that the foils16 axially protrude from the seats 54, 56 by some extent; to be moreprecise, by the expected cutting depth.

These seats 54, 56 essentially are radial shoulders in the guiding arms32, 34, supporting the foil 16 only in the axial direction and only fromradially outside. Due to the inherent elasticity of the metal foil 16,it strives to return to its initial state after deformation. Due to saidrestoring force, the foil 16 is clamped in a force-fit manner in theseats 54, 56 the four guiding arms 32, 34 which are uniformlydistributed in the circumferential direction.

The seats or shoulders 54, 56 in the guiding arms 32, 34 of the punch 10and the die 12 may differ and have different radial depths or differentdiameters d₅₄, d₅₆, as illustrated in the cross-sectional view in FIG.6. Said difference in diameter in the radial support area of the metalfoils 16 results in a difference in diameter in the annular blade 14formed by the foils 16. Said difference in diameter is selected suchthat the annular blade 14 of the punch 10 and the annular blade 14 ofthe die perform a shearing motion or can be moved past each other.

In order to ensure that the metal foil segments 16 always have a tightcontact to each other and to guarantee that the annular blade 14 of thepunch 10 is able to penetrate into the die 12 or its annular blade 14during the punching process without any collision between them, the foilends are provided with a corresponding shape so as to lower theresisting moment. For this purpose, the end portions of the foils areslanted and optionally rounded, in particular in the insertion direction(see FIG. 8).

Further, the seats 54, 56 are not disposed immediately in the outer areaof the guiding arms 32, 34, but are arranged further inwards in radialdirection by a certain distance x, so that during the cutting processthe aortic wall 58 is not affected during punching, on the one hand, andthe natural aortic valve is not severed exactly at the aortic inner wall58, on the other hand, but a constant attachment x remains for axiallyfixing the artificial valve (see FIG. 7). The exterior portions of theguiding arms 32, 34 serve, so to speak, as a spacer for supporting andstretching the aortic inner wall 58.

As the guiding arms 32, 34 are moved radially outside in a parallelmanner via a parallelogram-type mechanic system, as already illustratedabove, the seats 54, 56 and the foils 16 received therein are alwaysaligned and guided in parallel to the punching axis in order to achievetheir maximum cutting action with their edge 18.

The diameter of the annular blade 14 formed by the foil 16 can becontinuously adjusted by radially adjusting the guiding arms 32, 34; indoing so, the overlapping foils 16 slide on each other.

If the width of the guiding arms 32, 34 is enlarged, for example, theseats 54, 56 move radially outward and the foils 16 clamped thereinfollow the seats 54, 56 in automatic fashion due to their elasticallybendable pretension. The foils 16 slide on their overlapping sections 20with respect to each other. The maximal width adjustment is limited bythe length of the foil 16 and can be carried out only as long as thefoil ends still overlap.

If, however, the width of the guiding arms 32, 34 is reduced, the seats54, 56 move radially inward and the foils 16 clamped therein are furtherpushed in the inward direction, whereby the foil ends slide on eachother and the foil 16 is coiled more and more.

For adjusting the width of the foils 16, it is required that they beable to slide in the circumferential direction so as to unroll or curlup; hence, they need a specific degree of freedom in the circumferentialdirection. However, in order to avoid the foils 16 from slipping orfalling out of the guiding arms 32, 34 in the axial direction or inorder to prevent the foils 16 from always having the same spacing in thecircumferential direction, an end or a middle portion of the foil bands16 may be glued, soldered or fastened to the corresponding guiding arm32, 34 in any other way, whereas the other end remains freely movable.If one foil is used, it is preferred that a foil end is fixed, and ifseveral foil segments are used, it is preferred that a middle portion ofthe foil segment is fixed in each case.

In order to prevent that the entire blade 14 comes into contact with thetissue at the same time, the foil 16 may comprise different bladegeometries including an oblique, serrated or wavy cutting edge 18 (seeFIG. 9A to 9B), for example, in order to reduce the cutting or punchingforces.

In the following, a second embodiment of the invention will bedescribed, with which an identical cutting instrument is used; the foilblade, however, is not a single foil, but several foil segments 16arranged in the circumferential direction are used.

As is schematically and exemplarily illustrated in FIG. 10 for a cuttingtool (punch or die), several foils 16 (which are shorter as compared tothe first embodiment) are arranged in their longitudinal extension oneafter the other such that they overlap in alternating fashion inside andoutside. This foil assembly will be bent so as to result in a circularring, so that the first and the last foil 16 overlap as well;subsequently—like in the first embodiment—it is inserted incorresponding seats 54 and 56, respectively, which are formed on anaxial end of the guiding arms 32 and 34. Due to their elasticallybendable pretension, the overlapping sections 20 of the foils snuggleinto each other in tight fashion, so that the edges 18 of the assemblyof the four foils 16 form an essentially closed and circular annularblade 14.

Due to the inherent elasticity of the metal foil segments 16, these alsohave the tendency to return to their initial state after deformation.This restoring force has the effect that the foils 16 are clamped inforce-fitting manner in the seats 54, 56 of the four guiding arms 32, 34uniformly distributed in the circumferential direction.

As described in detail above, the diameter of the annular blade 14formed by the foil assembly can be continuously adjusted by a radialadjustment of the guiding arms 32, 34; in this process, the neighboringand overlapping foils 16 slide in each case so as to curl up or unroll.Apart from the guiding arms 32, the foil segments are mutually supportedon the overlapping sections 20. The maximum width adjustment is dictatedby the number of the foils 16 and their respective length and ispossible only up to a diameter with which neighboring foils 16 stilloverlap. The limit for increasing the diameter will be reached at thelatest when the metal foils segments do not have any guidance among eachother (see FIG. 11).

If, however, the width of the guiding arms 32, 34 is reduced, the seats54, 56 move radially inward and the foils clamped therein are pushedfurther inward and bent to a still higher extent. The overlapping foils16 curl up even more and the overlapping sections 20 become even larger.

Even if the foils 16 can be rolled up in an inward direction and pushedinto each other to almost any extent, a certain limit is reached if eachfoil 16 has been bent essentially by 360° and 4 layers of superimposedfoil segments 16 are present everywhere (see FIG. 12).

For adjusting the width of the foils 16, it is required that they beable to slide in the circumferential direction so as to unroll or curlup; hence, they need a specific degree of freedom in the circumferentialdirection. However, in order to avoid the foils from slipping or fallingout of the guiding arms in the axial direction or in order to preventthe foils from always having the same spacing in the circumferentialdirection, an end of the metal foil bands may be glued, soldered orfastened to the corresponding guiding arm 32, 34 in any other way,whereas the other end remains freely movable.

FIG. 13 shows a distal portion of a cutting instrument 102 according toa third embodiment of the invention. This cutting instrument 102 is verysimilar to the first two embodiments regarding the construction and itsmechanical system; however, it does not comprise a punch-die assembly onthe distal end of a tool shaft 104, but a cutting tool 112 which canalso be adjusted in width via an actuating mechanism and can be rotatedaround the instrument shaft axis. The blade is not formed by a foilblade, but by individual cutting blades 116 which are each detachablyfastened to a distal axial end of supporting arms 134, e.g. are insertedin an axial slit, or are firmly fastened thereto, and extend in theaxial direction or the direction parallel to the shaft and are providedwith blades 116 in two circumferential directions. The blades 116 areagain arranged so as to be arranged radially further inward than theouter surfaces of the supporting arms 134 by the distance x. The cuttingblades 116 extend contrary to the insertion direction of the instrument102, so that they do not act as a bayonet and injure tissue duringinsertion. When the cutting tools 110 are rotated in any direction, thethree cutting blades 116 make a circular cut. Similar to the first twoembodiments, the supporting arms 134 can be shifted via an actuatingmechanism in parallel to the shaft axis, whereby the cutting diameter ofthe cutting blades 116 can be adjusted. The actuating mechanism isessentially identical to the first two embodiments, so that also in thiscase a (not illustrated) rotary knob on the distal end of the instrumentshaft allows for the actuation of a shaft unit with a parallelogram-typemechanical system described in detail above. A difference to the firsttwo embodiments lies in the fact that a spring 143 is arranged betweenthe shafts, 142, 144 which can be shifted relative to each other andbring about the width adjustment, said spring biasing the two shafts142, 144 in a direction of adjustment. As an alternative, the widthadjustment may be achieved by means of a thread.

The function of the instrument 102 is very similar to that of theinstrument 2. For inserting the instrument 102, the supporting arms 134and the cutting blades 116 are pulled up to the tool shaft 104 asclosely as possible. Subsequently, the instrument 102 is inserted in atransapical manner and the cutting tool 112 is guided centrally throughthe aortic valve opening. In a next step, the supporting arms 134 arespread by actuating the actuating mechanism so far until the supportingarms 134 rest against the aortic inner wall. In a screw-like movement,i.e. in a superimposed axial and rotational movement toward the distalend of the instrument shaft, the blades 116 make a resection on theaortic valve. This cutting motion may be performed by a handpieceprovided on the distal end of the instrument shaft or can be effected ina motor-driven manner.

The present invention has been illustrated on the basis of preferredembodiments, but is not limited to these.

It is possible, for instance, to vary the number of the foil guides,foil segments and cutting blades. It makes sense, however, to select anumber which is as large as possible, so that a good guidance of themetal foil segments is ensured.

As described above, the punch and the die move into each other by acertain travel and cut off any tissue between them. It is alsoconceivable, however, that the seats for the punch and the die areidentical and both annular blades have the same diameter. Further, thecutting unit may also work like a bone punch; in this case, only one ofthe two tools comprises a blade and the other tool merely serves as ananvil.

It is also conceivable that an elastic fine-meshed net is laid over thefoil guides, as is already indicated in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5. This netfollows the adjustment of the punching diameter and forms a closed spaceduring the punching process, in which the severed aortic valves can becollected and safely recovered. This also prevents any chalky particlesfrom finding their way into the bloodstream. Moreover, the net maintainsthe blood flow during the punching process.

In the embodiment shown above, the foil blade is only provided with anexternal guide as the foil or the foil segments have the tendency tounroll and push radially outward. However, the foils may also beinternally guided in addition. In a variant, the radial interior guideis repositionable in order to be able to compensate for a resultant gapin the foil guide and to tense up the foils for the cutting process, ifnecessary.

In a variation, the entire distal portion forming the base of the secondcutting tool can be separately inserted and can be coupled to theinstrument in the course of an intracorporeal rendezvous procedure orcan be detached from the instrument after the successful cutting processvia a mechanical system actuatable by the handpiece and otherwiserecovered.

In a further variation, the two cutting tools—when brought together viathe handpiece for cutting off the aortic valve—do not only perform apurely translational movement, but a combined translational androtational movement or screw-like movement.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A surgical cutting instrument for aorticvalve resection, comprising a cutting unit arranged on a distal end of atool shaft and comprising at least one mechanical cutting element formaking a circular incision, the at least one mechanical cutting elementconfigured to be continuously adapted to different aortic diameters by aradially movable actuating mechanism, wherein the actuating mechanismcomprises one or more supporting arms or guiding arms distributed in acircumferential direction and supporting and guiding the at least onemechanical cutting element, the actuating mechanism designed such thatthe one or more supporting arms or guiding arms can be expanded andretracted parallel to an axis of the tool shaft so that the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms and the at least one mechanical cuttingelement remain in a parallel alignment relative to the axis of the toolshaft throughout an entire adjustment range, wherein the tool shaftcomprises a first tool shaft component and a second tool shaftcomponent, and the one or more supporting arms or guiding arms are eachconnected to the first tool shaft component by at least a first jointrod and are each connected to the second tool shaft component by atleast a second joint rod, the first and second tool shaft componentsbeing axially movable relative to each other such that an axial movementof the first and second tool shaft components is converted, via thefirst and second joint rods, into a radial movement of the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms.
 2. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 1 comprising a tool handle arranged on the proximalend of the tool shaft and a rotary knob, manually actuatable handlepiece which is coupled to the actuating mechanism to manually adjust thewidth of the cutting element which is already in a functional cuttingposition.
 3. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 1,wherein the cutting unit comprises a punch-die assembly, the punch-dieassembly comprising a punch unit and a die unit being movable at leastin an axial direction relative to the punch unit, the punch-die assemblycomprising at least one foil that is thin, elastically bendable, andannularly bent, the at least one foil overlapping itself in thecircumferential direction in spiral fashion and being made of metal ormetal alloy comprising foil layers, the foil layers having a mutual flatcontact such that a front edge of the at least one foil in a spiraledstate forms a single, common and essentially annular blade whosediameter can be continuously adapted to different aortic diameters bycurling up or unrolling the foil.
 4. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 3, wherein the at least one foil comprises anassembly of several thin, elastically bendable, and annularly bent foilswhich overlap in the circumferential direction and are made of metal ormetal alloy and have a mutual flat contact such that their edges form asingle, common and essentially annular blade whose diameter can becontinuously adapted to different aortic diameters by a relativemovement of the foils in the circumferential direction.
 5. The surgicalcutting instrument according to claim 3, wherein the at least one foilis supported on an outside of at least one of the one or more supportingarms or guiding arms in the radial direction, and wherein the at leastone of the one or more supporting arms or guiding arms is radiallyadjustable via the actuating mechanism, the at least one foilautomatically following a width adjustment in a radially outwarddirection due to an inherent elasticity of the at least one foil.
 6. Thesurgical cutting instrument according to claim 5, wherein the at leastone foil comprises a plurality of foils, and the at least one of the oneor more supporting arms or guiding arms comprises a plurality ofsupporting arms or guiding arms, and wherein a total number of saidplurality of foils is equal to a total number of said plurality ofsupporting arms or guiding arms.
 7. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 5, wherein the at least one foil comprises a firstfoil on the punch unit and a second foil on the die unit, and whereinthe blade of the at least one foil comprises a first blade on the firstfoil and a second blade on the second foil, the punch unit and the dieunit each comprising a foil guide formed by at least one of the one ormore supporting arms or guiding arms, wherein the foil guide of thepunch unit comprises a first diameter and the foil guide of the die unitcomprises a second diameter, wherein the first diameter and the seconddiameter differ such that the first and second blades move past eachother or perform a shear movement.
 8. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 5, wherein the at least one of the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms comprises a fine-meshed, elastic netwhich follows the width adjustment and forms a closed space during apunching process, in which space the severed aortic valves can becollected and safely recovered.
 9. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 3, wherein the overall length of the at least onefoil is, as a whole, longer than a circumference of a maximallyadjustable cutting diameter.
 10. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 3, wherein the at least one foil comprises a slantedor tapered foil end.
 11. The surgical cutting instrument according toclaim 3, wherein the punch unit and the die unit are detachably coupledto each other and distal parts of the punch unit and the die unit can becoupled to or uncoupled from the tool shaft.
 12. The surgical cuttinginstrument according to claim 1, wherein the cutting unit comprises acutting tool which is rotatably supported around the tool shaft andcomprises at least one cutting blade whose radial distance to therotational axis can be continuously adjusted to different aorticdiameters via the actuating mechanism.
 13. The surgical cuttinginstrument according to claim 1, wherein the one or more supporting armsor guiding arms comprises a plurality of axially aligned guiding arms,which are coupled to each other and serve as foil guides or as cuttingblade carriers, and can be shifted parallel to the axis of the toolshaft by the actuating mechanism by a parallelogram-type mechanicsystem.
 14. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 1,wherein the one or more supporting arms or guiding arms can be shiftedparallel to the axis of the tool shaft by means of a parallelogram-typemechanic system.
 15. A surgical cutting instrument for aortic valveresection, comprising a cutting unit arranged on a distal end of a toolshaft and comprising at least one mechanical cutting element for makinga circular incision, the at least one mechanical cutting elementconfigured to be continuously adapted to different aortic diameters by aradially movable actuating mechanism, wherein the actuating mechanismcomprises one or more supporting arms or guiding arms distributed in acircumferential direction and supporting and guiding the at least onemechanical cutting element, the actuating mechanism designed such thatthe one or more supporting arms or guiding arms can be expanded andretracted parallel to an axis of the tool shaft so that the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms and the at least one mechanical cuttingelement remain in a parallel alignment relative to the axis of the toolshaft throughout an entire adjustment range, wherein the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms are each connected to the tool shaft viaat least two joint rods, wherein each of the one or more supporting armsor guiding arms defines a parallelogram with the tool shaft and twojoint rods.
 16. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 15comprising a tool handle arranged on the proximal end of the tool shaftand a rotary knob, manually actuatable handle piece which is coupled tothe actuating mechanism to manually adjust the width of the cuttingelement which is already in a functional cutting position.
 17. Thesurgical cutting instrument according to claim 15, wherein the cuttingunit comprises a punch-die assembly, the punch-die assembly comprising apunch unit and a die unit being movable at least in an axial directionrelative to the punch unit, the punch-die assembly comprising at leastone foil that is thin, elastically bendable, and annularly bent, the atleast one foil overlapping itself in the circumferential direction inspiral fashion and being made of metal or metal alloy comprising foillayers, the foil layers having a mutual flat contact such that a frontedge of the at least one foil in a spiraled state forms a single, commonand essentially annular blade whose diameter can be continuously adaptedto different aortic diameters by curling up or unrolling the foil. 18.The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 17, wherein the atleast one foil comprises an assembly of several thin, elasticallybendable, and annularly bent foils which overlap in the circumferentialdirection and are made of metal or metal alloy and have a mutual flatcontact such that their edges form a single, common and essentiallyannular blade whose diameter can be continuously adapted to differentaortic diameters by a relative movement of the foils in thecircumferential direction.
 19. The surgical cutting instrument accordingto claim 17, wherein the at least one foil is supported on an outside ofat least one of the one or more supporting arms or guiding arms in theradial direction, and wherein the at least one of the one or moresupporting arms or guiding arms is radially adjustable via the actuatingmechanism, the at least one foil automatically following a widthadjustment in a radially outward direction due to an inherent elasticityof the at least one foil.
 20. The surgical cutting instrument accordingto claim 19, wherein the at least one foil comprises a plurality offoils, and the at least one of the one or more supporting arms orguiding arms comprises a plurality of supporting arms or guiding arms,and wherein a total number of said plurality of foils is equal to atotal number of said plurality of supporting arms or guiding arms. 21.The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 19, wherein the atleast one foil comprises a first foil on the punch unit and a secondfoil on the die unit, and wherein the blade of the at least one foilcomprises a first blade on the first foil and a second blade on thesecond foil, the punch unit and the die unit each comprising a foilguide formed by at least one of the one or more supporting arms orguiding arms, wherein the foil guide of the punch unit comprises a firstdiameter and the foil guide of the die unit comprises a second diameter,wherein the first diameter and the second diameter differ such that thefirst and second blades move past each other or perform a shearmovement.
 22. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 19,wherein the at least one of the one or more supporting arms or guidingarms comprises a fine-meshed, elastic net which follows the widthadjustment and forms a closed space during a punching process, in whichspace the severed aortic valves can be collected and safely recovered.23. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 17, wherein theoverall length of the at least one foil is, as a whole, longer than acircumference of a maximally adjustable cutting diameter.
 24. Thesurgical cutting instrument according to claim 17, wherein the at leastone foil comprises a slanted or tapered foil end.
 25. The surgicalcutting instrument according to claim 17, wherein the punch unit and thedie unit are detachably coupled to each other and distal parts of thepunch unit and the die unit can be coupled to or uncoupled from the toolshaft.
 26. The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 15,wherein the cutting unit comprises a cutting tool which is rotatablysupported around the tool shaft and comprises at least one cutting bladewhose radial distance to the rotational axis can be continuouslyadjusted to different aortic diameters via the actuating mechanism. 27.The surgical cutting instrument according to claim 15, wherein the oneor more supporting arms or guiding arms comprises a plurality of axiallyaligned guiding arms, which are coupled to each other and serve as foilguides or as cutting blade carriers, and can be shifted parallel to theaxis of the tool shaft by the actuating mechanism by aparallelogram-type mechanic system.
 28. The surgical cutting instrumentaccording to claim 15, wherein the one or more supporting arms orguiding arms can be shifted parallel to the axis of the tool shaft bymeans of a parallelogram-type mechanic system.